|
September
2006
| No
immediate possibility of Govt-Maoist talks |
Maoist
rebel leaders and Nepal"s seven-party interim government will hold talks
within 10 days in an effort to rekindle the faltering peace process, designed
to end a decade-long conflict in the Himalayan country.
Over
the past five months, the Maoists and the seven parties have been actively
engaged in the peace process following the end of the absolute rule of
the Nepalese monarch, King Gyanendra, after a mass uprising in April 2006.
However,
concerns are rising on both sides about a growing mistrust between them
and the lack of effective progress on ending violent in the kingdom, according
to members of the negotiating teams.
September
2005
| No
immediate possibility of Govt-Maoist talks |
Padma
Ratna Tuladhar, one of the facilitators of previous two rounds of government-Maoist
peace talks, has said there is no possibility of immediate dialogue between
the government and the insurgents even as the latter declared a three-month-long
unilateral ceasefire today.
Talking
to Nepalnews, Tuladhar said that CPN (Maoist) supremo Prachanda's statement
to observe unilateral ceasefire for the next three months is basically
a confidence building measure rather than a real gesture of talks with
the royal government.
September
2004
| Maoist
talks: Reality or Propaganda? |
» Prime
Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba said his government would give top priority
to re-start negotiations with the rebels and restore peace in the country.
upon return from Delhi more than a week ago, Deuba said the government
was ready to use force against the rebels if they did not respond to government's
call for peace negotiations. Unfortunately, there are no signs as yet to
indicate that the government is serious towards its proposal.
» The
central committee of the CPN (Maoist) blamed India of pressurizing the
Nepal government not to enter into peace negotiations and offering military
assistance to suppress the rebellion.
» Maoists
are now employing the policy of attacking India politically and launching
military offensive against the Royal Nepalese Army.
» Both
the government and Maoists are now moving towards complete militarisation
and none of them seem serious towards peace negotiations.
» The
Maoists said they would hold negotiations with the King only. At the same
time, they are also saying that they are preparing to enter into the phase
of 'strategic offensive.'
» It
can easily be (seen) that the King is moving towards authoritarianism while
the Maoists are moving towards extremism.
September 2004
| Why
third party mediation? |
» It
is ridiculous and incredible that an outfit claims to wage a war against
the State for the democratic rights of the people while continuously conducting
activities to terrorise, torture, loot, coerce, compel, intimidate, kidnap,
kill and murder innocent people. Abducting teenagers and forcing them to
join their militias, using innocent civilians, including children, old
men and women as human shields are criminal activities condemned by both
world bodies and international community. How dare Maoist leadership invite
foreign element, the UN or ICRC, as mediators in the present conflict between
September
2004
| Insurgency
& international mediation |
» Indian
Ambassador to Nepal Shyam Sharan, in a Press Conference before leaving
Nepal to assume his new assignment as India"s Foreign Secretary has given
some important indications about how India views the Maoist insurgency
and possible ways of solving it. Being a close neighbour of Nepal and a
country where many Maoist leaders have been living for several years, its
views need to be examined closely.India has been saying that terrorist
activities of the Maoists are a threat to both Nepal and India. Ambassador
Sharan has reiterated this view one more time. He has also stated that
a military solution "is neither probable nor possible".
August
2004
| Maoist
rebels want truce to open way for talks |
Nepal's
embattled government could open the way for talks with Maoist rebels if
it declares a ceasefire, stops branding them as terrorists and withdraws
international arrest warrants on them, a key intermediary said.
Padma
Ratna Tuladhar, who brokered two previous rounds of peace talks, said it
was up to the government to demonstrate good faith to bring the guerrillas
to negotiations to end an eight-year-old conflict that has killed thousands
of people.
July
2004
Nepal's
Maoist insurgency, which began in 1996, shows no signs of abating. Armed
rebels continue to kill security personnel as well as civilians as their
outlawed leaders issue statements - from their hideouts - saying they will
return to the negotiating table only if the United Nations is invited to
be involved in the peace process. To prove that their threats are not hollow,
Maoists shot dead exactly 12 security personnel on the day that Prime Minister
Sher Bahadur Deuba was to host a party to celebrate King Gyanendra's 58th
birthday last week. One of those killed was a senior police officer based
in the capital, who was shot in broad daylight, making people more frightened
than ever before. (Royal birthday celebrations continued nevertheless.)
The
first formal talks with the Maoists - who are fighting to establish a republic
in place of the constitutional monarchy - started in August 2001, about
a month after Deuba became prime minister for the first time; he was later
sacked by the king for "incompetence". But they broke down, giving the
Maoists an opportunity to reorganize. The second attempt to bring the Maoists
to the negotiating table produced a ceasefire agreement in January 2003,
three months after King Gyanendra staged a constitutional coup and appointed
a new prime minister to head the royal government.
The
ceasefire lasted for seven months, but broke down amid reports that soldiers
of the Royal Nepal Army (RNA) shot dead 19 detainees, suspected Maoist
rebels, in the eastern hill district of Ramechhap.
|