Maoists in Nepal
end
Human rights
Maoists in Nepal
INSEC: Annual Report 2004 August 2004
CEHURDES: Annual Report 2003
Amnesty International: Annual Report 2004 May 2004
Nepali Times Nepal conflict keeps the ICRC busy Apr 2004
HIMAL SOUTH ASIAN NHRC of Nepal amidst the ruins Mar 2004

August 2004

INSEC published the Annual Report 2004

Maoist abuses
This month, the number of Nepalis killed by fellow-Nepalis since the Maoist war began eight years ago crossed the 10,000 mark. The human rights organisation, INSEC, is the only independent organisation counting. But it lists only verified deaths, and there are thousands more undocumented cases. On 28 July, the count reached 9,996. A week later, it was 10,112. Of those killed, 268 are children under 17.

INSEC's Human Rights Yearbook 2004 also contained graphic details of Maoist brutality: victims tortured, beheaded, dismembered, bones crushed and axed. Lately, the Maoists have started threatening and abducting some human rights activists and journalists in the midwest.

Center for Human Rights and Democratic Studies (CEHURDES) - Annual Report 2003

Status of Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression in Nepal

Summary of the Nepal Report 2003

The situation of Nepalese press freedom remained volatile and critical during the year of 2002 as a result of the proclamation of the "State of Emergenc" and insurgency operation launched by the security forces against the rebels. Both the security forces and Maoists were involved in violation of the minimum standards of the human rights of the people and encroaching upon the press freedom of the journalists including free expression activists through killing, arrest, disappearance, misbehaviour and harassment.

The "state of emergenc" was lifted on 29 August 2002 after the extension from the government, which was declared on 26 November 2001 after the deadly Maoists attack over the military barracks after unilaterally breaking the "peace dialogue." As a result of emergency, the normal people were deprived of enjoying the fundamental human rights since the government suspended several articles related to fundamental human rights conferred by the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 1990.

Journalists and free expression activities were denied to undertake impartial news reporting from the affected areas and had to face obstacles to carry out free movement in those areas. The government broadcasted provocative news against the rebels through state owned Radio Nepal and Nepal Television including The Rising Nepal and Gorakhapatra. The government also directed the private media not to publish any news items against the security operation without the permission of the Royal Nepal Army or the Ministry of Defence or Home Affairs.

After the dissolution of the parliament in June 2002, the situation turned into more critical while the security forces were indirectly controlling the overall state power. During that period, the security forces undertook several atrocities during their operation and arrested dozens of the journalists. Nepalese Supreme Court also rejected petitions seeking to reinstate the parliament and approved the dissolution of the parliament thereby opening the door for fresh elections on 13 November 2002. On 4 October 2002, King Gyanendra assumed all executive powers by sacking caretaker Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba for failing to hold elections as per schedule on 13 November citing growing Maoist violence. On 11 October 2002, King appointed a government under monarchist Prime Minister Lokendra Bahadur Chand, granting him limited powers. On 29 January 2003, the government and Maoist rebels declared a ceasefire for the second time. The first cease-fire had broken down in November 2001 after three rounds of talks. The situation has changed after the declaration of the cease-fire. Many journalists were released as a part of the peace process.

Following the imposition of a "state of emergency" on 26 November 2001, more than 180 journalists were arrested in different parts of the country. Most of them were arrested under the recently introduced Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Control and Punishment) Act, 2002. The law was introduced to control rebel activities when the government declared CPN (Maoists) as terrorist and declared their activities as terroristic. The law, however, was misused rampantly against the civilians and media personnel. Dozens of people were physically tortured. And several detainees' whereabouts remain unknown. There have been no reports of official charges filed against any of the detained journalists.

During this period, the security forces and the Maoist rebels killed at least nine journalists. The security forces allegedly killed Mr. Krishna Sen, the editor of Janadisha daily in early June 2002 after torturing him within custody. He was arrested on 20 May 2002 from Kathmandu and was taken towards an undisclosed location. After an intensive investigation by Reporters Without Boarder (RSF), Mr. Sen was reported to be killed after being tortured by the security forces to get information regarding underground Maoist activists and their leadership. It was learnt that he was in good health prior to his arrest. He was detained about a month in an unknown detention centre. After the continuous pressure from national and international press freedom groups, the government formed an investigation committee under a senior officer of Ministry of Home Affairs that also denied the knowledge of his arrest and the killing. Sen had already spent 22 months in prison for publishing an interview with the Maoist leader Dr. Baburam Bhattarai and was released on 15 March 2001.

Journalists Kanchan Priyadarshi (Ishwor Budhathoki) of Sindhupalchowk, Yam B.K. "Patel" of Myagdi, D. Kaudinya (Dev Kumar Acharya) of Jhapa, Kamal A.C. of Kathmandu, Kumar Ghimire of Sindhuli and Raj Kumar K.C. of Ramechhap have also been allegedly killed by security forces. There was a separate report of killing Chakra Bahdur Budha (B.C.) of Surkhet by security force.

In the seven-years period of conflict, CPN (Maoists) were also involved in the killings of journalists alleging them of writing/reporting against their activities. Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) rebels murdered editor of "Kadam" and former editor of "Karnali Sandesh," Nawaraj Sharma, in Kalikot district (western Nepal). His badly mutilated body was found on 13 August. He was reportedly abducted from his house on 1 June 2002.

In separate case, journalist Ambika Timsina associated with the Pro-Maoist Janadesh and Mahima weeklies was found dead near the village of Pathari in Morang district (eastern Nepal) on 12 December 2002, after he was abducted by suspected Maoist rebels on the previous day. He had surrendered before the local authorities after the proclamation of the state of emergency in November 2001. It was learnt that he might have been killed by the Maoists alleging him of working as a spy against them.

Journalist Mumaram Khanal, Arjun Thapaliya, Minu Budhathoki and Prem Sagar have been reportedly abducted by security forces and their whereabouts is still unknown.

The CPN (Maoist) rebels abducted two journalists, Demling Lama and Dhan Bahadur Rokka, who were working for the state owned Radio Nepal. Lama was abducted in April 2002 but managed to escape from the rebel's control. Another journalist, Dhan Bahadur Rokka Magar, was abducted from Pyuthan district (western Nepal) on 1 August 2002. His whereabouts still remain unknown. Similarly, Nepal Samacharpatra daily reported that a local CPN (Maoist) chief had banned its reporter, Dipak Bahadur Thapa, from leaving his village since the mid-November 2002 on charges of writing against the Maoists "people" war. Thapa was also threatened of his life, if he left the village.

In the year 2002, press freedom was all the time under threatening from different sections of the society. Most of the journalists were released after the Supreme Court order after they filed habeas corpus petitions. But the security forces just outside of their prison again detained some of the journalists. Altogether eighty-three cases of Detention/Imprisonment were recorded during this period. Seven cases of Seizure/Censor/Ban, eighteen cases of attack/Misbehaviour/Manhandling, ten cases of Threat and nineteen cases of Legal actions were also recorded.
To protest against the arbitrary detention, more than 20 journalists and rights activists filed separate cases against the government at the district court of Kathmandu, Morang and Sunsari upon the legal support of the Legal Desk of CEHURDES in coordination with the Press Freedom Grand Jury, an alliance of nearly one dozen rights organisations, seeking maximum compensation and asking action against the perpetrators (police and army). The hearings are continuing.
In the course of time, the attitude of authorities, security forces and CPN (Maoists) rebels including the civilians have not changed. Journalists and free expression activists are still continuously facing harassment, threat and mistreatment from different sections of the society. The authorities and security forces still try to restrict information to media reporters. The rebels also control free access to media personnel in their strongholds.

To sum up, the situation of press freedom has not improved in Nepal as yet. However, journalists and free expression activists feel little bit relaxed after the declaration of the cease-fire. Many journalists have been released and have started publishing newspapers such as Janadesh, which had stopped publication following arrest of its entire staff. They also feel comparatively less threat from the authorities and security forces. In the mean time, the rebels have also said that they will not create any obstacles for the journalists and free expression activists to carry out impartial news reporting in their strongholds. Such assurances are yet to be tested. May 2004

Amnesty Interntional published the Annual Report 2004

Maoist abuses

Maoist abuses were reported during the cease-fire and escalated following the resumption of hostilities. Following the breakdown of the cease-fire, there were reports that 30 civilians had been killed by the Maoists. Maoists were also responsible for over 40 abductions and several reports of torture of abductees.

Child soldiers

There were reports that the CPN (Maoist) continued to abduct and recruit children between the ages of 15 and 18. Reports were received that scores of secondary-school children were abducted from schools in mid-western and far west regions and held for short periods for "re-education". It was alleged that the CPN (Maoist) used the cease-fire to recruit more children into their ranks. The CPN (Maoist) denied that children aged under 16 were recruited into its army or trained in the use of guns.

Human rights monitoring

No monitoring mechanism was put in place to implement the human rights provisions in the Code of Conduct governing the cease-fire. A Human Rights Accord drafted by the NHRC in May, mandating it to set up five regional offices to monitor human rights with technical assistance provided by the UN, was presented to the government and CPN (Maoist). Both sides agreed in principle to the Accord, although neither had signed up to it by the end of the year.

Extrajudicial executions

Reports of extrajudicial executions by the security forces were received during the cease-fire and increased following the resumption of hostilities.

'Disappearances'

Following the breakdown of the cease-fire in August, more than 150 people were reported to have "disappeared" after arrest during counter-insurgency operations by the security forces in Kathmandu and other districts.

Torture and ill-treatment

Torture and ill-treatment of detainees in the custody of the RNA, Armed Police Force (APF) and civilian police continued to be reported regularly.

April 2004

Nepal conflict keeps the ICRC busy

After the ICRC's role in securing the release of Beni prisoners, Nepal's warring sides may have finally found the need for this international organisation

Pascal Mauchle, head of the ICRC delegation, with interpretor Christoph Abbou (middle), brings home CDO Sagar Parajuli. Its strict neutrality and low profile work in looking after prisoner welfare in times of war means the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) doesn't usually figure in the limelight. But sometimes, as during the release by the Maoists of 37 Beni prisoners, the ICRC makes it to the headlines. Nicolas Bachmann, communi-cations delegate at ICRC in Nepal takes pains to stress his group doesn't mediate in conflict and, unlike other national Red Crosses, is not usually involved in delivering relief after natural disasters. Even in the Beni prisoner release, it wasn't the ICRC that made the first move.

April 2004

NHRC of Nepal amidst the ruins

Government attitude is threatening an institution which has shown some degree of seriousness towards ensuring protection of human rights. There ought to be a rethink.
At the eighth annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions concluded in Kathmandu on 18 February 2004, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Nepal stood tall amongst many of its peers from the region because of its interventions for promotion and protection of human rights in the ongoing-armed conflicts between the Maoists and the govern-ment of Nepal. Over 8,000 people have been killed, about a thousand have disappeared, thousands have been orphaned and widowed, and hundreds of thousands have been internally displaced since the Maoists began their 'people's war' in 1996.

top